Of course @delbigtree is lying about this. When he talks vaccines, he spouts either lies, misinterpretation of science, or outright pseudoscience.
-
-
Replying to @gorskon @handmadekathy
Then please explain this video where the lead scientist from the WHO is caught lying about vaccine safety. Uh oh. https://youtu.be/sPSpyEi01VI
5 replies 2 retweets 13 likes -
Caught lying about what? Some countries don't have the best safety monitoring systems in place and they are working to make it better? Isn't that exactly what the
#antivax want? MORE safety?1 reply 1 retweet 25 likes -
Exactly! What they said in the meeting is they’re working towards more safety, like we have in western countries
1 reply 1 retweet 17 likes -
Exactly. She didn’t say that vaccines are unsafe.

2 replies 1 retweet 25 likes -
Replying to @gorskon @handmadekathy and
While I have Del’s attention, maybe he can list the three ACTIVE surveillance systems in the US for adverse event monitoring after vaccination. He’s always complaining that VAERS is a passive reporting system, but VAERS is NOT the be-all and end-all of vaccine safety monitoring.
2 replies 1 retweet 26 likes -
Replying to @gorskon @handmadekathy and
Of course, antivaxxers portray VAERS as the be-all and end-all of vaccine safety monitoring because of the well known shortcomings of passive monitoring systems. Vaccine safety monitoring in the US is FAR more robust than just VAERS, though.
3 replies 1 retweet 28 likes -
Replying to @gorskon @handmadekathy and
And, of course, there’s more than just the US. Canada, the EU, and other countries also have active surveillance systems for bracing safety.
1 reply 2 retweets 25 likes -
Replying to @gorskon @handmadekathy and
The bottom line is that vaccines work and are incredibly safe. Also, they don’t cause autism.
6 replies 2 retweets 39 likes -
Why is it I can always provide examples for my point, David, and all you can do us site slogans. Not very scientific. But I guess you’re the best they’ve got. No wonder we are growing at a 500% increased rate, according to Dr. Heidi Larson.
15 replies 1 retweet 15 likes
More like, why is it that you can always cherry pick “examples” that very frequently, when examined critically, don’t actually support your point? But I guess you’re the best antivaxxers have.


Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.