No, contrary to what antivaxxers and cranks think, all truth does not come from public debate.https://respectfulinsolence.com/2013/04/26/all-truth-comes-from-public-debate-a-corollary-to-crank-magnetism/ …
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Pretty sure that I could disprove both quantum mechanics and general relativity in a public debate, as long as we kept the debate heavy on grandiose rhetoric and light on things like maths and facts..
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
There are medical professionals, pharmacists, nurses, doctors, toxicologists and scientists on both sides of the debate. What harm could come of a debate? Perhaps the pro-informed consent side does have a point?
- Show replies
-
-
-
Yes. Why have the debate?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Analytics. I use screenshots when quoting people. Added bonus is the picture lasts even if the tweet is deleted.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think more effort has to be put towards combatting their misrepresentation of modern journals, (well those from the mid 2000s at least) which they try screen cap parts of to try back their arguments up. That’s how they hook people onto their BS.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Explain this obvious collusion and fraud; and while you are at it how much are you getting out of it? It’s not anti-vaxxing which is a term to detract from truth it’s quacks now like you that somehow managed to obtain a license colluding with pharmapic.twitter.com/As6u5gKIUw
-
I think this is called confirmation bias with a lashing of dunning Kruger.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.