Telling that they ask: How do breast cancer patients respond to naturopathic therapies in comparison to the needs of other types of cancer patients? Rather than: How does breast cancer respond to naturopathic therapies in comparison to other types treatments?
-
-
-
This is so much BS, it’s readily apparent to a lay person like myself. Why would anyone print this? None of this stuff is going to have an effect on breast cancer. (Homeopathy) yet the article implies that it does.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It’s the Washington Times version of a journal, I’m guessing.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Quote from the article: "Many of the modalities can be used strategically alongside oncology treatment..." In other words, they admit up-front that these modalities are not treatment for cancer.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I have to point out that in the Wikipedia on this place it lists the school colors as "cranberry and ginger", not red and gold. Whatever benefit this offers could be provided by a SW and chaplain.I've seen fulminating breast tumors in women who go this route. It's awful.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.