Here’s a hint. Nowhere did I propose the idea of an “unquestionable scientific consensus.” I merely said that if you question a scientific consensus without strong evidence or rationale, scientists are under no obligation to take your challenge seriously. 2/
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Happy New Year! Ye yuletide unroll: Thread by
@gorskon: This is the single most awesomely clueless example of someone who didn’t actually read beyond the… https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1210539343259086855.html …. Share this if you think it's interesting.
End of conversation
-
-
-
I'll remind a quote by Carl Sagan: "But the fact that some geniuses were laughed at does not imply that all who are laughed at are geniuses. They laughed at Columbus, they laughed at Fulton, they laughed at the Wright Brothers. But they also laughed at Bozo the Clown."
-
Yep. I was going to use that one too, but I thought the Shermer quote more appropriate, even at the risk of taking some heat for quoting him.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.