This is the single most awesomely clueless example of someone who didn’t actually read beyond the title of the post or, if he did read it, totally missed the point of the post. 1/https://twitter.com/PanTransHuman/status/1210418184433487872 …
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Think of it this way: What’s more likely to be closer to the truth, a scientific consensus based on mountains of evidence, or the rantings of an antivaxxer, creationist, quack, or climate science denier? 11/
I’ll conclude with a quote from Michael Shermer: “For every Galileo shown the instruments of torture for advocating scientific truth, there are a thousand (or ten thousand) unknowns whose ‘truths’ never pass scientific muster with other scientists.” 12/12
Stereotyping all people who raise concerns about vaccines as antivaxxers; all who note the lack of clear empirical data on the greenhouse effect as climate science deniers, is a dishonest way of ridiculing people w valid points as if they don't know what they're talking about. 
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.