No. In fact, I pay all the bandwidth charges for my blog out of my own pocket. It's my hobby.
I also don't recall questioning your integrity, only your understanding of evolution, neuroscience, epigenetics, genetics, and medicine.
https://twitter.com/DeepakChopra/status/1207395388308758528 …
-
Show this thread
-
In fairness, I did accuse
@DeepakChopra of a double standard when it comes to criticism, but it was a valid criticism. He gets all indignant when I use a bit of sarcasm about him, but then he goes and JAQs off about whether I'm paid by pharma to attack "natural health."9 replies 1 retweet 99 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @gorskon @DeepakChopra
I particularly like the article's notion that the only reason you would 'defend pharma' is (A) you are paid to or (B) you don't like humans (WTF?), dismissing any possibility that maybe as a Dr you are just against anti-science quackery.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @fecak @DeepakChopra
Indeed, that
@Cloudnician just naturally assumes that I wouldn't criticize "natural health" and alternative medicine if I weren't paid by pharma to do it says a lot more about him than it does about me. Project much, Mr. Grundvig?2 replies 1 retweet 7 likes -
I like to call it the "pharma shill gambit."https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/the-pharma-shill-gambit/ …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Indeed, I'm disappointed in Chopra. This post shows the sort of thing that happens when the pharma shill gambit is weaponized.https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/in-which-i-am-once-again-in-the-crosshairs-of-age-of-autisms-pharma-shill-machine-gun/ …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.