The antivaccine activist above does not want answers. She thinks she has them, even though her claims are wrong. Trying to silence criticism by wrongly calling it hate speech isn’t going to work. At best, it just shows you misunderstand what hate speech is, as well as vaccines.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I am sorry, but you are not showing more understanding of that than of vaccines issues. There is a dramatic difference between the person sharing grossly inaccurate antivaccine misinformation and the people correcting her.
1 reply 0 retweets 12 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Rejecting the evidence is not asking questions. To remind you, last time we had a discussion you confused vaccine failure with shedding, and measles with mumps, in an effort to explain away deaths from a disease outbreak that started due to low vaccines rates.
2 replies 3 retweets 20 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
The insert says there has never been a case of transmission. It’s quoted here, with a link. https://www.google.com/amp/s/vaxopedia.org/2019/01/29/show-me-the-vaccine-insert/amp/?client=safariYou … have provided no study showing otherwise. RNA in the urine of the vaccinated person is not shedding to another.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
So yes, this is exactly an example of you not asking questions but saying incorrect things, in an effort to excuse away an outbreak that is killing children and that antivaccine activists are working to make worse.
1 reply 1 retweet 7 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
And describing antivaccine activists who are, as you showed, consistently wrong as “informed” is.... strange.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Oh, come on! They're not "antivaxxers." They're "vaccine risk aware"! Just ask them!
-
-
Vaccine skeptics
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.