Lots of nutrition studies are like this. They p valued this to death to find something - and it is pretty meaningless - and that from someone who loves #culinarymedicine (no medicine is not food, but that is sort of the point)
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The sample size was 15...? Is that even a thing? .05 is borderline. Yikes.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
R won't save people from stupidity.
- Show replies
-
-
-
These studies get published because researchers get reviewed and edited by their peers. My take is peer review system tends to perpetuate poor science once a certain precedent of bad methodology has become the norm in a field. That and the misuse of statistics as a form of proof.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Freaking flawed! That is a sham of a study and I didn't even need to read it. N=19 and no control group. I'd be embarrassed to present this!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Is it correct that a t-test, simply put, is looking at one variable in the data (like blood pressure) and comparing it to the mean of the population (or a sub-group)? And it’s problematic to do so many in a low n study because you’re likely to find differences by chance alone?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.