Vaccines are important and they save lives; every medical intervention comes with both benefits and risks. Taking a stand for independent scientific verification of vaccine safety is not “anti-vaxx,” no matter how many times that lie is repeated.
-
-
How will
@marwilliamson improve on that? Remember, it's an antivaccine lie that VAERS (the passive reporting system) is the be-all and end-all of vaccine safety. There's so much more to the system. -
It's also a lie that there are no "vaxxed/unvaxxed" studies comparing health outcomes in vaccinated versus unvaccinated children. Guess what, though? They tend to show that vaccinated children are healthier. At worst, they're neutral, finding no health differences.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Three active monitoring. VSD, PRISM, which I think you had in mind, are the main ones, but I think CISA, with its focus on special issues - vulnerable populations, special adverse events - should also count. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/ensuringsafety/monitoring/cisa/index.html … https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/ensuringsafety/monitoring/cisa/index.html#activities …
-
Fair enough. I forgot about CISA.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
How does this work? How can it work without the patient or doctor reporting them?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Case report of this happening?
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.