And you don't understand what "required by law" means
-
-
Sotomayor wrote the dissent, RBG joined.
-
Ah, I knew RBG was on the dissent. I just forgot who wrote it.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Here's why it's moot anyway. I believe the only state that hasn't adopted some form of this is Penn. The wording is clumsy, but nutshell: if a "reasonable doctor" would use/prescribe it, then there's no design defect.pic.twitter.com/wFkTzt9R0t
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It looks like they wanted to dissent because they erroneously concluded vaccine design would stagnate without a looming threat. Then they created a narrative to support that conclusion. Problem is the narrative required manufacturers to prove a negative to avoid liability.pic.twitter.com/Jw9v9pHxJo
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.