The issue is that @gorskon and others do discuss unproven surgical practices.
You were shown this.
Multiple times.
I’ll do it again.
And in one month you’ll continue to make the same wrong claim.https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/do-doctors-pay-attention-to-negative-randomized-clinical-trials/ …
-
-
Someone once wrote “communicating scientific information isn’t easy.” I wonder what
@VPrasadMDMPH would say to that person? https://www.statnews.com/2016/05/09/medical-errors-deaths-bmj/ …pic.twitter.com/xw9Ag9gA2B
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
On the other hand, if we defend deconstructing pseudoscience in medicine as a worthy endeavor on its own, he dismisses it as unworthy of physicians or scientists to sully their hands with.
-
Someone has to stand for science-based medicine, which I believe is the best medical practice. Not just using 'what works' but what can be shown to work, scientifically. Having read Dr Gorski for some years now, I also know that he supports this idea.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Don’t you know Dr. Gorski that once you become a MD, let alone a PHD. Your time becomes open to scrutiny. I am just amazed that you watch ‘football’ shouldn’t you be in the Lab saving people’s lives? Think of all the people that could of been saved s/
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
He reaaaaaaaally wants to be verified
-
In fairness I think he was verified before but gave up his old Twitter account and then came back to Twitter in a time when Twitter had placed a moratorium on giving out new check marks.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.