This @sciam article is cringeworthy. For example: “And this is what’s most troubling: instead of taking shots at what’s in your fridge or nightstand, she could be using her platform to talk about...”
This is the “Why don’t you write about what *I* think is important?” gambit. 1/https://twitter.com/writingblock/status/1199677634218774534 …
-
-
Also, “I am the fucking expert” was about forced birth trolls. But what are facts anyway?pic.twitter.com/cSS8qqB4Y4
-
I’d forgotten about the context of that one. That makes
@writingblock’s use of it disingenuous as hell.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This piece reads as a grudge that is poorly-disguised as feminist critique. What’s unfortunate, is there is dialogue to be had about the dismissal of women’s lived experience in healthcare, and the author stole my engagement bc I thought that was what this was about
-
I doubt that was an accident.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
They do this pretty much once a week, don't they? Publish something that is outrageous and in the service of either bad science or outright pseusdo. Is this their marketing strategy? "I don't care what you say about me as long as you include the @ tag"?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Appeals to anecdotes over data is precisely why we have anti-vaxxers and I'll even go as far to say Trump as president. Note how it's in verrryyyyy tiny print at the bottom that she helped edit the book she venerates in the article. She should have copped to that in the article.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
She contributed to the our bodies our selves or whatever it’s called for the 2005 update she stated in her article. It’s just sour grapes on her part.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@michaelshermer you wrote a skeptic piece for@sciam for a long time. What is going on now? Just opinions for clicks?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
-worthy. 4/
5/