Indeed. I've learned over the years that it's a common tactic of science deniers to invoke legalistic arguments and reasoning to attack science. Science isn't the law, and scientists are not lawyers. Science isn't decided using the same methods as court cases.https://twitter.com/nath4nglx/status/1196633452033888257 …
-
-
It is, however, a decent way to be skeptical of bad scientists. If they've falsified one paper, then the rest should come under greater scrutiny as well. Like anti-vaxxer Wakefield's retracted Lancet article or anti-GMO Infascelli's Nature paper.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.