If I'd shared a piece saying "HPV vaccines cause serious neurological harm" I could understand ur advice not to share (not that I would share such a thing outside my expertise). But the editorial isn't about that & its content seems more or less on the mark as a general critique
-
-
I think he came in having done some good work on issues with clinical trials and bad behavior by pharmaceutical companies. His
#vaccines work, however, has consistently been highly problematic. -
Probably one of those who cannot (or no longer) separate the shady schemes by pharma companies from the science...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Looking through his publications it almost looks like he's an influenza denier, or at least an impact of influenza denier: https://www.bmj.com/content/346/bmj.f3037.short …
-
He is. Consistent themes in his writing include claims that the flu isn’t as dangerous or deadly as we are told and that the flu vaccine doesn’t work. He even spoke at an antivax conference run by NVIC.https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/crank-conferences-a-parody-of-science-based-medicine-that-can-suck-in-even-reputable-scientists-and-institutions/ …
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.