Would really advise not sharing this. The author is, on vaccination, positively misleading & resorting to conspiratorial claims. @gorskon or @Rosewind2007 could elaborate
-
-
This was quite obvious when I had a look. But how on earth does this quack end up being an associate editor?
-
I wish I knew. He has no medical training. His training is, as I recall, as an anthropologist. Yet he pontificates on vaccines, in particular the flu vaccine, all the time, parroting antivaccine misinformation and distortions of science. He has no business as an editor of BMJ.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
David, did you see Gøtzsche’s latest piece? He was very cross about Trish Greenhalgh’s paper regarding Cochrane and basically had a hissy fit. BMJ features in the references:https://twitter.com/Rosewind2007/status/1194268731637149696?s=20 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Stop shooting the messengers. The former editors of The Lancet and the NEJM highlighted the real problem - the crisis of corrupt medical research. Up to half of it could be "simply wrong" according to Richard Houghton.pic.twitter.com/zqSmsE3Eh3
This media may contain sensitive material. Learn more
-
I'd start looking at Keele if I were you.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
And tell me Dr Gorski, why are there "antivaxers"? Do you think it's because of trauma, injury and death occuring post-vaccination?
-
I'll go with 'ignorance', 'fear' and 'suspicion'
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.