Please point out my ad hominems. I want to discuss the issue with Jay on the science, not the emotional scare tactics he is employing. I never have, nor will I ever call him a name or belittle his character. I'm sure he's doing what he believes is right, but I disagree... 1/2
I must admit, I laughed out loud when I read this one: “Even the things they are correct on, simply serve as virtue signaling opportunities. They could care less about the subjects themselves. Their target is not any quest for truth. The target is you.”
-
-
I mean, the guy’s entire blog is one long wank of virtue signaling and asserting how much better he is than “those skeptics.”


-
Your academic institution and colleagues must be so proud of such elegant and erudite rhetoric.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
