Exactly. My point is that a physician should know better than to use such a shaky study to attempt to prop up his weak pre-conceived beliefs.
On skeptics: “They bully the public through media ridicule, character defamation, intimidation, social pressure and gleefully enacted ill behavior to such an extent that scientists and media will only speak against the movement in private.”
Sure, dude. Whatever.
-
-
I mean, a week or two ago didn’t we have a very prominent young oncologist complaining about how useless the skeptical movement is? He even did a while podcast about it, as I recall.
-
I must admit, I laughed out loud when I read this one: “Even the things they are correct on, simply serve as virtue signaling opportunities. They could care less about the subjects themselves. Their target is not any quest for truth. The target is you.”
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
“As an ethical skeptic, when you point out this set of methodological errors on their part, you are not committing an ad hominem informal fallacy. ... even though they may perceive it as such.” And, I suspect, the Dunning-Krueger Effect comes into play with
#fakeskepticism -
That one made me laugh even more, given how off base it is.

- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

