And the anti-vax folks don’t want to be labeled that - but they choose not to believe science and so it is ok to label them. That is what they are. Again, they are lost in misinformation - I won’t change their mind, because facts don’t matter to them.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I label the leaders - and talk to the patients. When you have someone who says, “Well all these kids get autism after vaccines..” like
@billmaher even admitting science has proven this to be correlation and not causation - is that helpful? It stokes fears in parents1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Well
@billmaher has had a lot of time and people in his life to explain things to him and he has a single focus - we can explain until the cows come home, he has a view which is unchanged by science - I talk to the people who he might influence and work to override them0 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @MtnMD @terrysimpson and
No, he’s not provax. It’s telling that the example on his show that he used to “prove” his provax bona fides was that if there were a vaccine for Ebola and he had to go to an area where Ebola outbreaks had occurred he’d get the vaccine
2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes
Let’s just say that if you have to construct such a specific and unusual hypothetical in order to argue that you’re not antivax, chances are very good that you’re antivax.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.