Alternative medicine is aimed at women who hence bear the burden of the harms. My issue was being dunked on without being tagged. And anyone who thinks I’m “just” the “anti goop doctor” hasn’t bothered to read my work so shouldn’t be commenting on it.
-
-
Replying to @DrJenGunter @iXeno and
Also, how many people who have been dunking on me have had to call the FBI because of threats after pieces they have written and then because they know people are listening and need the info keep writing about the subject anyway? Right. And what I do is easy? Fuck. Right. Off.
1 reply 5 retweets 21 likes -
Replying to @DrJenGunter @GinaMcGalliard and
I am big supporter Jen - I am not dunking on you deliberately, maybe this is meant for someone else - or maybe I over-stepped bounds by tagging you in on topic you know about and there are media people following the thread. Apologies - no more tags to bother you.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @iXeno @GinaMcGalliard and
I am just replying to everyone on the thread. This isn’t directed at you.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @DrJenGunter @iXeno and
David Gorski, MD, PhD Retweeted David Gorski, MD, PhD
Tellingly, this whole kerfuffle erupted after the 10' dunking oncologist in question posted a dismissive Tweet about dunking on alt med on Twitter. Someone responded with a link by me. And then…https://twitter.com/gorskon/status/1189729901903056896?s=21 …
David Gorski, MD, PhD added,
David Gorski, MD, PhDVerified account @gorskonReplying to @gorskon @BrowOfJustice and 2 othersFor the record, this is the Tweet that I responded to that set me off. Go one Tweet above it, and what do you see? A Tweet that links to a post by me discussing the pseudoscience of Goop. https://twitter.com/vprasadmdmph/status/1188943269410922497?s=21 …1 reply 0 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @gorskon @DrJenGunter and
I get
@VPrasadMDMPH's point, though I don't approve of his subsequent behavior. A lot of people are hurt by medicine's "accepted" practices. People given chemo, made bankrupt by treatments that we as doctors endorsed. Vioxx and Avandia killed 200,000 people.6 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @aribindi @DrJenGunter and
You're conflating things here. Patients go bankrupt from expensive cancer treatment, whether it's based on strong or weak evidence, because they don't have adequate heal;th insurance, which is a societal problem in the only industrialized country w/o universal health insurance.
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
As for our 10’ dunking oncologist's original point, no skeptic denies that there are medical practices that can cause harm and aren't supported by sufficiently strong evidence, at least none I've ever encountered in my nearly two decades of doing this.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
It's also not as though skeptics haven't been discussing the relative values of working on conventional medical practices with insufficit evidence versus alternative medicine quackery. There's a serious, thoughtful discussion to be had there, one that's been going on a long time.
2 replies 1 retweet 10 likes -
Moreover, skeptics generally welcome newcomers from different backgrounds who want to join the discussion, even if it's on the side that we should spend more time on pharma/harmful medical practices than CAM/quackery/antivax.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes
Again, there's a serious and thoughtful discussion to be had there. It's one I've taken part in many times.
-
-
However, when someone condescendingly tells us that what we do is easy and worthless while pointedly refusing to construct a coherent argument for why they think that other than,“Taking on pharma is hard; what you do is trivially easy," well, we're human too. We won’t react well.
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Maybe they're right. Maybe what they do is harder. It's possible .However, just saying it doesn't make it so. They have to give us something resembling evidence and a coherent argument in order to get us to consider their viewpoint.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.