People keep tagging me on tweets about a Scientific American article that takes issue with skeptics. If you don’t get the real harm so called wellness with its love of medical conspiracy theories, you haven’t read enough on it 1/2
-
-
I should've just said, "So what? Educating about and combatting medical pseudoscience are every bit as important as holding big pharma to account and pointing out lack of evidence for some conventional treatments." Oh, well. Learn from your mistakes.
-
Lesson: Whenever possible, don't argue within your critic's framing of the issue being discussed. Doing so implicitly accepts their frame as the correct one. Point out the frame and reject it.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.