Dr. Gorski has been blogging about pseudoscience since 2005. Providing extensive information and valuable tools. You’re not providing constructive feedback. You’re dismissing.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @VPrasadMDMPH @doritmi and
The antivaxx movement has been partially marginalized. Andrew Wakefield will never be interviewed as a credible source on mainstream media as he once was. It’s also hard to imagine another Dr. Oz gaining fame. Gorski deserves credit for this.
0 replies 1 retweet 22 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @VPrasadMDMPH @doritmi and
Do you have evidence for this claim?
0 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @VPrasadMDMPH @doritmi and
Yes. Though I can only credit gorski generally with successes like this. Not that there is not more work to be done. It’s hard to believe that silence is the best response.https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/film/2016/mar/27/robert-de-niro-pulls-vaccination-film-tribeca-vaxxed …
0 replies 4 retweets 12 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @VPrasadMDMPH @doritmi and
I agree there is a reasonable conversation to be held about methods. But he’s done much more than angry tweets. Would you like to be judged on your tweets alone? Are bad oncology studies still being published? If the answer is “yes” is your work useless? I think not.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
Indeed. Are fewer or more useless or marginally useless oncology drugs on the market now compared to before Dr. Prasad started *his* crusade? If there are more, then what should I conclude.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.