Agree 100%. So many 'debunkers' making a career out of it, when it only serves to spread the original fantastical claims.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Replying to @drjasonfung @VPrasadMDMPH
Do you have any evidence of that, or are you just salty from being dunked on by skeptical thinkers?https://respectfulinsolence.com/2018/05/30/an-unholy-combination-of-methodolatry-and-quackery-apologia-with-jade-eggs/ …
0 replies 3 retweets 24 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Debunking alt med may be easy. Doing so effectively is not. Most debunkers of alt med also do a good job of holding conventional med to task as well. There’s a need for both. Agree that Streisand effect is possible with debunking.
1 reply 3 retweets 22 likes -
Replying to @JHowardBrainMD @VPrasadMDMPH and
Ill also add that learning how to debunk alt med has made me much better at recognizing spurious claims by big pharma (though I am far from the best at it.). Critics thinking is important all around.
2 replies 3 retweets 23 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @VPrasadMDMPH @JHowardBrainMD and
You obviously haven't been doxxed properly yet. You stay cooped up in your ivory tower looking down on ppl in the trenches eh? Well, when you can get your hands dirty, then you can have a valid opinion
2 replies 0 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @renissance_1 @VPrasadMDMPH and
Being anonymous for me is to resist the argument from authority. All I care about is evidence. His idiotic ad hominem attacks are laughable. Typical of science deniers.
2 replies 1 retweet 10 likes
That was a large reason (albeit not the only reason) why I started out pseudonymous.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.