I keep saying, it’s not that good a paper, and here is why. There is nothing untoward about anything reported here, yet they report it as if it is, and bolster a false narrative. It’s just not a good paper.https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1179457662414675968 …
-
-
The headline is actually false as well, he did not have an account, just word of a complaint. You don’t find out the facts until they’ve given Trump’s line about this being a conspiracy. It is badly written, misleading, the falsehoods lead and the truth is buried at the bottom.
-
We know that repetition of falsehoods before correction reinforces the falsehoods. Between the headline and the first 10 paragraphs the story primarily reinforces the false narrative before reaching the correction. Total communication failure.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.