Those who deem themselves “vaccine injured”: “my arm was sore” or, as in the flu vaccine, “my muscle hurt”. That’s not injury, Karen. We just prevented you from getting sick or getting dead. The manager doesn’t want to talk to you. #VaccinesWork
-
-
Replying to @stephjantzen @DrPanMD
So much of the activist rhetoric is about choice/freedom (e.g., the 3 women at the center of the protests), not injury--as this piece nicely shows...https://time.com/5606250/measles-cases-rise-fighting-vaccines/ …
1 reply 2 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @RMCarpiano @DrPanMD
Yes, I know...we all need to stand firmly for public health and science. And history: vaccines are so effective they have been their own worst enemy. As I say this I can’t not be in disbelief. Like we are arguing facts.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
You are VP of Perry Communications Group. Your client list is packed full of health industry trade groups. Your statement is a non-scientific generalization about a suite of sold/administered-for-profit, liability-free products known to cause injury/death in susceptible.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Nope. I’m mom to a boy who had a legitimate medical exemption for eight years. The moment I could begin vaccinating him I felt so grateful. He’s now healthy and strong. No measles or mumps for this kid
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
Being the mom to that boy, does not erase the fact that you are also the VP of Perry Communications which has the described clients: https://perrycom.com/clients
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PlumRemson @stephjantzen and
You are indeed the VP. https://perrycom.com/about/stephanie-mcgann-jantzen-vice-president …
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
They haven’t pulled it down from their website yet. Yes I was, unapologetically, by the way. The work PCG does in patient advocacy is incredible. How does this relate to saving lives through Immunization?
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @stephjantzen @PlumRemson and
Pharma shill gambit. It's all antivaxers have, ad hominem and poisoning the well. It's almost always their go-to move when they don't even have pseudoscientific arguments any more, as it's part of their central conspiracy theory.
2 replies 2 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @gorskon @stephjantzen and
Asking about a conflict of interest is not a "shill gambit". You are indulging in ad hominem in the very tweet in which your are ascribing it to others. Vaccine-risk-aware consumer advocates cite science everyday in discussing vaccine injury risk.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31205057?fbclid=IwAR0OcMjK18q99XM5RFTISfRcLyczMgXyTQJOjYh1a1H4BYJYI-IzTCGBxEQ …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
"...a definitive relationship between the vaccine and death could not be identified. Histopathological examinations revealed pneumonia and upper respiratory infection as contributing to death in their cases." That paper does not show what you think it does.
-
-
Replying to @gorskon @PlumRemson and
Also, yes you were using the shill gambit. It's very predictable among antivaxers, their very favorite trope, and you helped demonstrate that.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @gorskon @PlumRemson and
Finally, nice cherry picking of a study. The preponderance of evidence in the medical literature shows that vaccination is not associated with SIDS and, if there is any correlation at all, might actually be protective against SIDS.
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.