OK, I'll bite. If you're not an antivaxer, you should have no trouble answering this: Which vaccines in the CDC-recommended schedule do you consider safe and effective enough that you support administering them to all children without medical contraindications to vaccination?
-
-
Replying to @gorskon
You make my point perfectly. It's not my job to decide. I'm for liberty. I support every individuals right to choose for themselves. They should do their own research and consult their own doctor, not government or a politician like me.
4 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @RepStickland
I'm not letting you off the hook that easy. So I'm asking: Which vaccines do you consider safe and effective? You have children, right? So surely you must have "done your own research and consulted your own doctor" and made a decision about which vaccines to give your children.
2 replies 1 retweet 49 likes -
Replying to @gorskon
We have made the decision to administer certain vaccines to our children, at our desired pace/schedule. I won't let you bully me into making our private medical decisions public. Privacy matters and you big pharma shills have a long history of hateful bullying.
8 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @RepStickland
"Bullying"? Here you are a state legislator, and I'm just some random doctor on Twitter. I can't force you to do anything or answer any question; yet your reaction to reasonable questions about vaccines is to complain about being "bullied." Do you see how silly that sounds?
2 replies 0 retweets 61 likes -
Replying to @gorskon @RepStickland
But, still, without revealing the exact vaccines and your chosen delayed schedule, surely, Mr. Strickland, you can describe the results of the research that you did that led you to this decision and the process you used to decide which vaccines are safe and which are not.
1 reply 0 retweets 39 likes -
Replying to @gorskon @RepStickland
After all, you are a government official, a legislator. On Twitter, you're demonizing vaccines, but you won't get specific about which vaccines you're concerned about. Don't you want your constituents to know your thought process?
1 reply 1 retweet 39 likes -
Replying to @gorskon
I consulted with my doctor. I haven't demonized vaccines, just those power hungry, financially incentivized who want to use government force to push their product. Make the case for your product on your own, not through mandates and lawsuit immunity!
4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @RepStickland
So you mindlessly did what your doctor suggested without doing your own research? How, then, can you criticize anyone for following her doctor's advice and vaccinating according to the CDC-recommended schedule, which is what by far the vast majority of pediatricians do?
1 reply 0 retweets 51 likes -
Replying to @gorskon
I don't criticize anyone else's decision, you're the bully doing that, not me.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Bullying. You keep using that word...pic.twitter.com/QtDc0Paio3
-
-
Replying to @gorskon
Bullying: verb gerund or present participle: bullying seek to harm, intimidate, or coerce (someone perceived as vulnerable). **This is exactly what you are doing**
25 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @RepStickland @gorskon
You are not being bullied. You are asked to justify your position which is unscientific. Remember Janet Parker - died on 9/11 - the last one to die of smallpox in the world. Do you know why we don’t have smallpox - because vaccines work. She died in 1978
0 replies 0 retweets 28 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.