I have read this perverse editorial @doritmi ...
Your argument is blatantly one sided..
Your Opinion.. Is mute...http://blogs.harvard.edu/billofhealth/2013/06/24/guest-post-no-liability-for-failure-to-vaccinate-the-case-has-not-been-made-a-response-to-mary-holland/ …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @alumilynn @Awithonelison and
Your belief inflammation is a magic key to explain all disease is wrong. You float over the mass of medical science plucking this or that you think supports your notions, mixing cause and effect. You can't learn pathology on Google. Start with the basics: https://www.elsevier.com/books/robbins-and-cotran-pathologic-basis-of-disease/kumar/978-1-4557-2613-4 …
1 reply 2 retweets 23 likes -
Replying to @ChrisJohnsonMD @Awithonelison and
I don’t need it, I have Lance tox books etc. Alison throws off the wall unrelated remarks all the time, & it had to do with the debate Matt & I had when I responded to her earlier, not about the inflammation. There is always a cause & effect for everything. Just saying.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @alumilynn @Awithonelison and
No you really, really need some basic understanding of pathology and Robbins is the standard text for rookies. Because you are deeply confused about how disease works. And your self-confidence far exceeds your limited fund of knowledge. There's a reason it takes a decade to train
2 replies 1 retweet 17 likes -
Replying to @ChrisJohnsonMD @alumilynn and
But gotta learn the normal first before getting to Robbins. And the normal includes premed level biology and chemistry. Robbins can't make any sense without mastery of histology, anatomy, physiology, cell biology, etc.
2 replies 1 retweet 10 likes
Quite true. You need to know normal anatomy, physiology, biochemistry, and histology before pathology can make sense.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.