"Destroying civilization"? Let's see, inclusion of minority narratives, even if rather incoherent, is "destroying civilization." How could that be, unless by "civilization" you implicitly really mean white, European/American civilization.
https://twitter.com/peterboghossian/status/1162471237441900544 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @gorskon
That's maliciously uncharitable. He is speaking out against a particularly divisive and conspiratorial ideology based on shaky postmodern-style epistemology. He sees it as fuel for the fire of civilization-endangering polarization seen in the US, of which he sees 45 as a symptom.
2 replies 1 retweet 26 likes -
Replying to @TheRajala @gorskon
No. He’s a buffoon who thinks culture is static, and any attempt to consciously divorce ourselves of our behaviours that excluded everyone but the dominant class is a threat to his culture. It probably is. But it needs to die.
1 reply 0 retweets 21 likes -
Yes, it is polarizing to suggest that finally, after hundreds of years, we listen to any experience other than of white dudes like him. Because some people are bigots. The restbof us just get over it and move on with our lives, better for the diversity of knowledge.
3 replies 0 retweets 19 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
And that would be true. We are all subject to implicit bias and sexism as it is inculcated in us by our culture. The data shows this, we all carry implicit biases, all sexes races etc. The answer isn't to deny we carry baggage that is racist and sexist, but to try to improve.
3 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
You're boring.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Not only boring, but he's not too bright, either.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.