The way the author carefully chose the age group to be limited to young women, together with the significant difference in % college degrees between vaccinated vs unvaccinated women suggests this is a very biased, non-scientific study.
-
Show this thread
-
Also, make sure to read this other very critical review of this paper, written by the amazing Orac aka
@gorskon :https://respectfulinsolence.com/2018/06/13/antivaccine-pseudoscience-about-hpv-vaccination-gayle-delong/ …2 replies 13 retweets 79 likesShow this thread -
In which Orac reveals that the lone author of this paper and the people she lists in the acknowledgments are active anti-vaxxers, who might have some bias in reporting certain results or leaving out other data.
9 replies 12 retweets 67 likesShow this thread -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Yes, I am biased! I am a scientist who is biased in thinking that scientific studies should be carefully designed for confounding factors. I am also biased about my stance that the benefits of vaccines in almost all cases outweigh side effects (unless immunocompromised).
6 replies 4 retweets 55 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @krohn1238 @MicrobiomDigest and
What the fuck is a chemistry processor and where can we buy one for the lab
2 replies 3 retweets 15 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @krohn1238 @MicrobiomDigest and
I...don't even know how to respond to this.
4 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @JRJHealey @krohn1238 and
Block and live your life without wasting another moment on this person?
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes
Or drink on him and laugh. Either is a valid response.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.