Is there any evidence to support this hypothesis, though? That's always been my first question when I hear this argument for not making mass shooters.https://twitter.com/radleybalko/status/1157785779302801409 …
-
-
the data is nigh impossible to collect (suicide association detection is hard enough and it's at 14 per 100k per year, being a mass murderer is orders of magnitude smaller), so we're going to have to rely on what we currently know. The direct question will be elusive.
-
Seeing as many mass murderers are doing so to advance a mission or notoriety or to send a "message" the scientific principle of "c'mon it's pretty plausible" should likely hold until disproven. Publishing names, manifestos, and messages, and describing their mission doesnt help.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
