Her foreign policy would be equally whimsical, nonsensical & reckless.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
- Show replies
-
-
-
Doesn't matter. Hold your nose and vote. However, you're right. It's highly unlikely.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
My two "Oh please, no!" candidates are Williamson and Gabbard. It would be a tough vote to make but I would do it. Pretty sure it won't come down to that.
-
I was about to say exactly this but they would never get the nomination anyway.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I’m no fan of Williamson and I find the anti-science stuff very dangerous. But half of the people on that stage the other night were calling for a nuclear first strike - if you can vote for them, you can vote for her.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
In that case, your choice would be (maybe) 4 more years of one vs (maybe) 8 years of the other.
-
I'm old enough that death is looking less and less horrible of those are my choices for the next 4-8 years.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
She's one of a few that, if it came down to it, I'd be holding my nose. But there is no question that if it's Trump vs *any* of our 20, I'm going to be among the first in line at my polling place. Like you, I'm confidently hoping we pick one of the far more qualified in the group
-
And you call the right mindless?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.