Of course, @marwilliamson is an antivaxer, her recent recantation notwithstanding. Her support for vaccines always has a "but," and that "but" always includes antivax tropes. Will @billmaher challenge her? I doubt it. He's at least antivax-sympathetic. 2/https://respectfulinsolence.com/2019/07/25/marianne-williamson-is-antivaccine/ …
-
-
Show this thread
-
When
@marwilliamson inevitably makes her claim that 54% of children have a chronic illness (which she's repeated several times in the last couple of weeks), will@billmaher and the panel know that's an antivax talking point based on a dubious interpretation of a 2011 study? 3/Show this thread -
When
@marwilliamson does her JAQing-off implication that vaccines are the reason for skyrocketing childhood chronic illness, will@billmaher and the panel know that there's not a shred of reliable evidence linking the two? 4/https://respectfulinsolence.com/2019/08/02/faye-flam-defends-marianne-williams/ …Show this thread -
Sadly, probably not. When it comes to vaccines
@billmaher's record is not good. He'll probably nod, agree, and amplify@marwilliamson's "I'm not antivax" antivaccine shtick. 5/5Show this thread -
Forgot to mention: I don't know if I can watch
@billmaher and@marwilliamson spread antivax distortions tonight. I'll try, but I'll likely fall asleep. 5a/5Show this thread -
Also, my wife hates the show and if she is still awake she won't be thrilled if I watch. 5b/5
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Really, antivaxxers and pseudoscience peddlers should not be given a platform like this.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.