We don't have any idea if the microbes were applied to the apples from a compost tea, which is an unnatural input.
-
-
Replying to @mem_somerville @songberryfarm and
We also don't know what was applied to the conventional apples, do we?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @Stylopidae @KarlHvM and
The fact is that Science 2.0 did everything it could to imply the opposite.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @songberryfarm @Stylopidae and
I never cite Science 2.0 or Hank Campbell. I might have linked to one of their things in the past before I gathered enough evidence of the poor scholarship there. Not to mention this crap:https://medium.com/@Keira_Havens/science-2-0-refuses-to-remove-nazi-eugenics-blog-posts-d0ef7e782806 …
2 replies 4 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @KarlHvM @songberryfarm and
I agree. Also, several ScienceBlogs alums requested that Hank remove their blogs. They got nowhere. It's not clear that Sb had the right to sell its limited right to republish our work, but we'd have to hire lawyers if we wanted to pursue it.
2 replies 1 retweet 5 likes -
Interesting. A number of us have had similar experiences with another generally like-minded project. Some people don't seem to appreciate being revealed for putting ideology ahead of science.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @songberryfarm @KarlHvM and
I have no idea what you're talking about.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Sorry, David. I'll leave the explanation up to someone you consider more credible.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I'm not interested enough to care, actually, and don't know enough about you to make a judgment on whether you're credible or not other than that you're just some dude on Twitter.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.