The authors of the Hoax make a good case that the level of intellectual and scientific corruption in certain disciplines is appalling. They convinced me.
-
-
That Boghossian thinks his study/hoax was so damning just reveals how little he knew about the subject he was claiming to study, in addition to his utter ignorance about human subjects research ethics and regulations.
-
Or, he knew it too well...
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
So, the challenge is up. Try this in a cross-disciplinary study and see which disciplines perform best in peer review and which perform worst.
-
No it isn’t. I told you. This is not the function of peer review, and there are enough junk journals in all fields that you can send computer generated manuscripts and get them accepted. It’s been done. This is not an interesting problem.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
