This has to be the most self-important and pompous while simultaneously ignorant responses to criticisms of Peter Boghossian's study supposedly "exposing" what he calls "grievance studies." Dude, human subjects research protection regulations SHOULD be enforced vigorously. 1/https://twitter.com/chrisontwatter2/status/1153960022021300225 …
-
-
What human subjects?!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You don't need a degree to be familiar with the Milgram experiments, Tuskegee, or WW2. Sheesh.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
As someone who has read over 100 (200+ page) pharmaceutical study protocols (phase I-V), I have presented my arguments based on my knowledge of research on human subjects, and am denounced by people who have never gone beyond opening a science book in college. It's so frustrating
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Intentions matter, to expose the broken corrupt dogmatic parts of academia being pushed as "truth" and the dogmas they manage to implement via regulation, with no evidence to back it up, just feelings. He did good, and helpful for the fields who look to reduce uncertainty.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The hoax/“study” was *designed* to publicly humiliate the editors/subjects. Defenders believe PSU must permit such “research,” without prior review, merely because, they think, the subjects *deserve* to be humiliated. So who’s arguing ideologically?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.