Skip to content
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • Moments Moments Moments, current page.

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
gorskon's profile
David Gorski, MD, PhD
David Gorski, MD, PhD
David Gorski, MD, PhD
Verified account
@gorskon

Tweets

David Gorski, MD, PhDVerified account

@gorskon

Surgeon/scientist promoting science in medicine and exposing quackery. Editor of Science-Based Medicine. My opinions do NOT represent those of my employers.

Michigan, USA
sciencebasedmedicine.org
Joined October 2009

Tweets

  • © 2021 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Chris #FBPE #PeoplesVote #RevokeA50  🇪🇺‏ @chrisontwatter2 23 Jul 2019
      Replying to @gorskon @PsychPLockwood @peterboghossian

      Not "who was harmed" but "who was a human subject and how would the training apply to them"?

      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
    2. Mark Hoofnagle‏ @MarkHoofnagle 23 Jul 2019
      Replying to @chrisontwatter2 @gorskon and

      The subjects were the peer reviewers and the other academics that contribute to a literature who had their field and reputations smeared. The goal of the study was ideological ax-grinding, and an attempt to devalue the careers of others that they don’t think have value.

      4 replies 0 retweets 4 likes
    3. Mark Hoofnagle‏ @MarkHoofnagle 23 Jul 2019
      Replying to @MarkHoofnagle @chrisontwatter2 and

      Now, whether or not that field should exist is an opinion, and that would be fine to have. Subjecting humans to an experiment to study that opinion without consent, without oversight and with *deception* of all things was very bad judgment.

      1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
    4. Patrick Lockwood‏ @PsychPLockwood 23 Jul 2019
      Replying to @MarkHoofnagle @chrisontwatter2 and

      Bad judgment/risky absolutely. Not sure how to otherwise accomplish the goal.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    5. Mark Hoofnagle‏ @MarkHoofnagle 23 Jul 2019
      Replying to @PsychPLockwood @chrisontwatter2 and

      You can use deception in research but it must be vetted. It would still be questionably ethical to waste all these people’s time with bullshit you made up as a “study” because you don’t like what they study. Human subjects probably should never be used for ax-grinding.

      1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
    6. Patrick Lockwood‏ @PsychPLockwood 23 Jul 2019
      Replying to @MarkHoofnagle @chrisontwatter2 and

      I agree mostly. I'm still lost, how do we expose systems if said systems are biased. If they have a bias against your sham study on philosophical grounds (which your study is trying to attack) how else to prove the point? I'm not intending to be dense or disagreeable.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    7. Mark Hoofnagle‏ @MarkHoofnagle 23 Jul 2019
      Replying to @PsychPLockwood @chrisontwatter2 and

      Go through the IRB, create an ethical framework, involve the subjects post hoc in the critique so they could possibly benefit, reimburse their time, apologize even. Also don’t ridicule peer reviewers. It’s unpaid labor, and isn’t designed for fraud detection.

      3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
    8. Patrick Lockwood‏ @PsychPLockwood 23 Jul 2019
      Replying to @MarkHoofnagle @chrisontwatter2 and

      Ridicule is problematic, calling attention to lack of quality is different.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    9. Mark Hoofnagle‏ @MarkHoofnagle 23 Jul 2019
      Replying to @PsychPLockwood @chrisontwatter2 and

      Ah yes. But what does it say about exposing lack of quality in research while not following *basic rules of human subjects research*. I mean, I contact the IRB (at least for waivers) even for registry research. To actually contact/identify human subjects without IRB? Wow.

      1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
    10. David Gorski, MD, PhD‏Verified account @gorskon 23 Jul 2019
      Replying to @MarkHoofnagle @PsychPLockwood and

      Exactly. I keep trying to explain it, and people keep failing to get it: RESEARCHERS DON'T GET TO CHOOSE whether their research is IRB exempt. Only the IRB can make that determination, using the rules specified to define what research doesn't require IRB oversight.

      2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
      David Gorski, MD, PhD‏Verified account @gorskon 23 Jul 2019
      Replying to @gorskon @MarkHoofnagle and

      Most IRBs even have a fast-track process for determining whether research falls under one of the specified categories of exempt research. In most cases, the chair of the IRB can make the determination.

      6:57 PM - 23 Jul 2019
      • 2 Likes
      • Doctor_David Patrick Lockwood
      0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2021 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Cookies
        • Ads info