That’s some straight up bullshit. What human subjects did you supposedly abuse in the process of the Sokal Squared papers? Mark was probably just offended as he identified more with the grievance studies you were shedding light on and he gets to wield some power over you now.
-
-
Editor's suggestion: His arrogance and utter ignorance are staggering.
-
OK, if you insist.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Do you actually think there's a strong argument to say the reviewers of the journals that published this complete rubbish should be considered 'human subjects'?
-
Yes. Do you think...they are not humans?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Charlatans are using taxpayer money to commit obvious fraud in the service of ideological obsessions. What Boghossian and the others did was necessary to demonstrate what is going on. Universities need to be regulated or defunded. Fraud must be stopped.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Human subjects parading as scientific review boards. If you consider these people to be scientists, the incident was inter pares, then bringing up these rules really is clutching at straws. If you don't, well then exposing that should be given some leeway. This whole human..
-
subject stuff is pretty weak.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Do you have the view that research involving human subjects *shouldn’t* have to follow guidelines for research on human subjects?
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.