This is how believers in quackery dismiss skeptical analyses of their quackery. In this case, the treatment is the Paddison program for rheumatoid arthritis, pharma shill gambit and the "just some guy/blogger" gambit. Of course, I am a surgeon and cancer researcher. 1/https://twitter.com/HollyGo55/status/1151469044161220609 …
-
-
And...predictably
@hollygo55 circles back to the pharma shill gambit when forced to admit that she doesn't know what she's talking about and can't provide any evidence to back up her praise of the Paddison program.
3b/3https://twitter.com/HollyGo55/status/1151473391796391936 …Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Nobody here can say it doesn't work because they never tried it. If I stop the programme the RA comes back. Proof enough for me. I don't need data to back up anything. Thousands of people aren't lying are neither am I.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I realise you are a liar and try to twist my words. I never admitted anything. I said data not required. Your article is NOT fact based as you haven't applied your assumptions to anyone to disprove something that works for many thousands of people. Your arrogance is shameful. 2/
-
As a scientist your mind is closed off. Just because there is no data does not mean something does not work. My rheumatologist accepted it worked. He didn't need data. I am the data. So simple yet you just don't get it or refuse to. Arrogance or stupidity or another agenda? $$$
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.