This is how believers in quackery dismiss skeptical analyses of their quackery. In this case, the treatment is the Paddison program for rheumatoid arthritis, pharma shill gambit and the "just some guy/blogger" gambit. Of course, I am a surgeon and cancer researcher. 1/https://twitter.com/HollyGo55/status/1151469044161220609 …
-
-
And
@HollyGo55 admits that she can't find a single error of fact, science, and/or interpretation in my post criticizing the Paddison Program as quackery. No surprise there. 3a/3https://twitter.com/HollyGo55/status/1151474546073112576 …Show this thread -
And...predictably
@hollygo55 circles back to the pharma shill gambit when forced to admit that she doesn't know what she's talking about and can't provide any evidence to back up her praise of the Paddison program.
3b/3https://twitter.com/HollyGo55/status/1151473391796391936 …Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thousands of people testify it works. You haven't proven that it doesn't by writing an article. Paddison has a science degree.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.