This is how believers in quackery dismiss skeptical analyses of their quackery. In this case, the treatment is the Paddison program for rheumatoid arthritis, pharma shill gambit and the "just some guy/blogger" gambit. Of course, I am a surgeon and cancer researcher. 1/https://twitter.com/HollyGo55/status/1151469044161220609 …
-
-
If we're going to harp on qualifications, I also can't help but note that the Paddison program was dreamt up by an Australian comedian. There's no real biological plausiblity, and no good scientific or clinical trial evidence that it works. 3/3
Show this thread -
And
@HollyGo55 admits that she can't find a single error of fact, science, and/or interpretation in my post criticizing the Paddison Program as quackery. No surprise there. 3a/3https://twitter.com/HollyGo55/status/1151474546073112576 …Show this thread -
And...predictably
@hollygo55 circles back to the pharma shill gambit when forced to admit that she doesn't know what she's talking about and can't provide any evidence to back up her praise of the Paddison program.
3b/3https://twitter.com/HollyGo55/status/1151473391796391936 …Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
My own experience and thousands of others versus one man who has never even tried it. How much did the drug companies pay you to write the article?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Can I just comment quickly on how appropriate her name rings for me, since I only associate GoLightly with spewing shit for hours until you are an empty husk passed out on the floor?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.