Here's the post to which I referred. Clearly, @HollyGo55 never bothered to read it. Certainly she can't point out any substantive errors of fact or interpretation in it. 2/
-
-
Show this thread
-
If we're going to harp on qualifications, I also can't help but note that the Paddison program was dreamt up by an Australian comedian. There's no real biological plausiblity, and no good scientific or clinical trial evidence that it works. 3/3
Show this thread -
And
@HollyGo55 admits that she can't find a single error of fact, science, and/or interpretation in my post criticizing the Paddison Program as quackery. No surprise there. 3a/3https://twitter.com/HollyGo55/status/1151474546073112576 …Show this thread -
And...predictably
@hollygo55 circles back to the pharma shill gambit when forced to admit that she doesn't know what she's talking about and can't provide any evidence to back up her praise of the Paddison program.
3b/3https://twitter.com/HollyGo55/status/1151473391796391936 …Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.