So, two points. 1. Of course I have read them. Neither offers a more valid or reliable estimate 2. The existence of an undesirable outcome doesn't at all imply that the studies are invalid or unreliable. (See "Appeal to Consequences")
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
So what are you recommending?
End of conversation
-
-
-
The press reports wonder drugs, advertises supplements, and extolls the value of magnets in one's shoes too. Doesn't mean we should not use the results of a peer-reviewed paper to provide a temporary estimate of medical error It does mean we should put effort into improving it
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.