yeah, but no. Until someone improves on those two numbers by doing a more rigorous study, it is just cherry -picking to deny the numbers.
You seem to be saying plausibility doesn’t matter? I guess I can start accepting research by homeopaths as believable then!
-
-
Plausibility as the product of personal opinion doesn't work as the replacement of a published paper in a peer-reviewed journal. Your personal opinion that the upper limit of a range offered by a paper, remains just your personal opinion. Your opinion isn't data
-
Plausibility can be abused in that way, but it's not "just a product of personal opinion." I'll give you an example: Homeopathy. Is it just a "product of personal opinion" to say that homeopathy's precepts violate several laws of physics and chemistry, making it impossible? No!
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
