And there you have it. Shermer is called out for disparagingly referring to "SJWs," and his response is a masterpiece of false equivalence. Here's the problem. Words mean things. "Neo-Nazi" is a generally agreed upon term to describe a certain set of ideologies, for instance. 1/https://twitter.com/michaelshermer/status/1147621886634782720 …
-
-
Mr. Shermer's false equivalence is also a false dilemma: Either concede that fascists like Proud Boys are operating in good faith as the price for him to stop using SJW derisively, or let him continue, thereby letting him frame "SJWs" as being as bad faith actors as fascists. 10/
Show this thread -
We get it, Mr. Shermer. You view "SJWs" as acting in bad faith, hence your contemptuous, sarcastic use of the term "SJW" to describe them. Maybe you even view them as being as bad as fascist. 11/
Show this thread -
Not surprisingly, I choose neither option of the false dilemma.
12/12Show this thread -
Addendum: For
@michaelshermer's benefit, just in time, Gavin McInnes, founder of Proud Boys, likens beating up antifascists to Nazi soldiers in World War II killing unarmed Soviet soldiers. Apparently he didn't get the memo not to approvingly invoke Nazis.https://twitter.com/dlamontjenkins/status/1147633727436218368 …Show this thread -
Yet another addendum: All too frequently the police side with the fascists.https://twitter.com/chuckmodi1/status/1147635405061349378 …
0:58Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.