Hilariously, David is unknowingly supporting @AnnMarieNavar's comparison. Antivaxers frequently go straight for the pharma shill gambit, and his first go-to move is to invoke the pharma shill gambit rather than addressing substance—very much like an antivaxer.
https://twitter.com/LDLSkeptic/status/1144280418277044227 …
-
-
In fact, it's a look I've seen many times before from antivaxers, cancer quacks, etc., etc.
-
Actually, the pharma shill gambit is an ad hominem fallacy, which is a subcategory of the logical fallacy of poisoning the well. Not a good look as your first move.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.