Let's also just say that certain papers deserve to be publicly in a "demeaning way." If a paper is designed to deceptively or through incompetent science promote a viewpoint that endangers children, such as antivax), I will not hold back.
-
-
Show this thread
-
Deserve to be publicly criticized...
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It is part of scientific integrity, something many "science skeptics" seem to be very keen on, indeed. What they have to understand is that critique is (as a rule) not directed at the SUBJECT of the paper but to the METHODS employed.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.