Finally someone get’s it!https://twitter.com/califf001/status/1139570587909722114 …
-
-
Replying to @MarkHoofnagle
He puzzles me. He advocates using cybersecurity measures to combat disinformation, but I see nothing about how one might operationalize such measures. And, really, is anyone actually going to use DDoS attacks against the websites of purveyors of medical misinformation?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @gorskon
I think the implication is public health authorities would be empowered to demand hosting services pull down disinfo, while giving regulatory authorities more leeway and funds to rapidly respond to fraud and shenanigans.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MarkHoofnagle
The First Amendment would be a huge impediment, I would imagine. Websites, for instance, are not like Facebook, Twitter, or YouTube.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @gorskon
Not to fraud. Not to public health disinfo. This is the classic fire in the theater example.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I suspect it's more complicated than that and not nearly as clear cut.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.