Instead, I target the fence sitters, the ones who might be influenced by antivaxers. Those include the vaccine hesitant. As for where antivax influence is strongest, it's almost certainly Facebook, not Instagram.
-
-
I don’t own the internet. I’ve been on Facebook since it was introduced to undergrads at Duke as one of the first schools in 2004. I used Friendster, Xanga, and MySpace. I’m NOT anywhere near the first doc on FB/Twitter/IG/YT, and NEVER claimed to be.
-
Bit of a straw man there, eh?
I never said you said or implied any of that. I said the story portrayed you as "creating and leading an army of medical experts" to "drown out" health misinformation on social medial. That portrayal rubbed some of us the wrong way. - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Think we're all on the same team here. Lots to learn from the folks who have been fighting the good fight for a long time but applaud your efforts to from a group (and to have this be part of your paid job).
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That's how it struck me. I'm all for getting more people in the antivaxx fight. But, if you ignore those who have been in this fight already, you're not going to get very far. Dr. Gorski mentioned experience fighting the death threats. Not many can stand up to that and quit.
-
AHSM is not just about vaccines. It’s also about the POSITIVES of social media use...plus best practices for spon con and FTC, disclosures, professionalism and DMs, hashtag campaigns, misrepresentation citing medical lit., academic recognition, institutional partnerships, etc
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
