The example in this article is pure cancer quackery. You seem to be saying that the NHS should pay for expensive cancer quackery. https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/the-deadly-false-hope-of-german-cancer-clinics/ …https://twitter.com/CHPIthinktank/status/1130446206642065408 …
A point you illustrated by using an example of Brits using crowdfunding to pay for quackery. What else am I supposed to think other than that you think the NHS should fund quackery? You couldn't find an example that wasn't blatant quackery to illustrate your point?
-
-
Again, apologies if it came across in that way. It was not our intention.
-
Really important not to use bad examples like that or you lose your credibility. I am sure you are right, but put best evidence out there.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.