While I applaud Mr. Amash for reaching the obvious conclusion that @realDonaldTrump engaged in impeachable offenses, I'm having a hard time finding a straightforward statement here that he thinks the House should start impeachment proceedings. Am I wrong?https://twitter.com/justinamash/status/1129831615952236546 …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @gorskon
THOUGH THERE IS IN FACT NO SUCH CATEGORY AS "IMPEACHABLE OFFENSES". CONGRESS CAN IMPEACH A PRESIDENT FOR ANY REASON, NO REASON, OR BAD REASON. ANDREW JOHNSON WAS IMPEACHED FOR (CORRECTLY) REFUSING TO ENFORCE AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAW. IMPEACHMENT IS NAKEDLY POLITICAL, NOT LEGAL.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RepublicanDalek
Impeachable offenses are whatever Congress says they are.
2 replies 1 retweet 5 likes -
-
-
-
Replying to @gorskon @Vershered
*PEDANTS*, NOT:
#YOUDESERVEDTHISpic.twitter.com/vkI2TWZsfA1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RepublicanDalek @Vershered
You've infected my keyboard's predictive typing algorithm, obviously.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @RepublicanDalek @Vershered
Fortunately, I"m not the Doctor.
7:08 PM - 18 May 2019
0 replies
0 retweets
2 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
