I’m baffled by the number of people who think Harvard had a choice between undermining a norm vital to the criminal justice system or making a small number of its own marginally less happy with their dorm experience... and concluded that the dorm experience was more important.
-
-
Replying to @conor64
Not a vital norm. This was a mercenary decision by a lawyer. Weinstein is no indigent client, Sullivan is not a court-appointed attorney. Sullivan's decision was crass. I think he's a great guy. Was even his intern once. Still, gross decision, and they are free to object.
1 reply 1 retweet 11 likes -
Replying to @MarkHoofnagle @conor64
And while I think Sullivan has put a lot more good in the world than most, that doesn't mean he is beyond criticism, or that every choice about representation is defensible. Why not big tobacco next? Or Exxon for their AGW science suppression? These are choices.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @MarkHoofnagle @conor64
Would you judge surgeons based on who they operate on?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @AneeceColt @EdwardGemmer and
No. Medicaid reimbursement is lower than that from a good insurance plan, but certainly not orders of magnitude lower—not even close to one order of magnitude lower. The differential is significantly less than two-fold in general.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @AneeceColt @gorskon and
I get a salary. I operate largely on the uninsured. I’d probably save the health system money if I just shot myself. I try not to think about it too hard.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
I'm on salary too. Most of my patients are on Medicaid.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.